Kolari Vision are a popular choice for IR conversions on many camera types. Their prices are reasonable and they have many wavelengths on offer. Recently they've added an option to have any of these internal filters coated with a special anti-reflective (AR) coating to reduce hot spots. When I heard about this I had to give one a try because a lot of native lenses for the Sony FE cameras (A7 series) suffer from hot spots and many of them quite badly. Normally there is no fix for the hot spot issue because it's due to the lens, but let's put it to the test to see if it's as good as they advertise...
Anti-Reflective coated external filters are nothing new, so it's been possible to use them on a full spectrum conversion for a while. Filters like the 093 MRC, from B+W (an 830nm IR filter) have this coating. You can spot these because instead of being an opaque (black) colour they reflect a blue/purple. The same is true of the Kolari internal filter (see below).
Full spectrum conversion (left) vs the AR coated 720nm conversion from Kolari (right)
The problem with these external filters is that they don't do anything for hot spots. I have tested this on several different types and there is no discernible difference at all. Because of this I was a little dubious as to the effectiveness using a similar trick on the internal filter replacement. Fortunately that concern was very short lived because this internal coating does indeed work. It doesn't completely remove the effect, but it does take it down by 1-2 stops in intensity. What I mean here is that; Let's say a hot spot normally starts to show up on a lens (using a normal internal conversion) at f/8, it will start closer to f/16 on the coated conversion, and that can make all the difference.
Note: In all the below samples Kolari's coated version will be on the right.
The IR hot spot on the FE 50mm is not bad at all. It's not as clean as theSony/Zeiss 55mm f/1.8, but then not many lenses are. What little hot spot there is here on the smaller apertures is almost non-existent on Kolari's coated filter. Let's see how it does with a worse performer...
The difference here, between the standard and coated filter is much more noticeable. The difference at f/8 being the stand-out one for me. This lens really starts to get annoying at f/8 on a normal filter, whereas the coated version is considerably better.
Some lenses provide terrible results when stopped down and this is frustrating true of native wide Sony Lenses. Although the coatings clearly help, it won't be enough to save the day in these extreme cases. It'a worth noting that 720nm is also pretty forgiving. The hot spot will be intensified with the stronger wavelengths like 830nm or higher.
At 720nm the Batis lens is generally acceptable at f/4, when using Kolari's coated conversion. With a standard 720nm filter the chances of getting usable results on the same lens and settings are heavily against you, producing a large amount of failures. This is where the coated option shows it's true value in my opinion. Common middle apertures see improvements that often make the difference between a good image and a bad one.
Anti-Reflective coated external filters are nothing new, so it's been possible to use them on a full spectrum conversion for a while. Filters like the 093 MRC, from B+W (an 830nm IR filter) have this coating. You can spot these because instead of being an opaque (black) colour they reflect a blue/purple. The same is true of the Kolari internal filter (see below).

The problem with these external filters is that they don't do anything for hot spots. I have tested this on several different types and there is no discernible difference at all. Because of this I was a little dubious as to the effectiveness using a similar trick on the internal filter replacement. Fortunately that concern was very short lived because this internal coating does indeed work. It doesn't completely remove the effect, but it does take it down by 1-2 stops in intensity. What I mean here is that; Let's say a hot spot normally starts to show up on a lens (using a normal internal conversion) at f/8, it will start closer to f/16 on the coated conversion, and that can make all the difference.
Results
Here are some samples, comparing a few different AF lens options for the Sony FE platform. All of these options are known to produce a hot spot to varying degrees. These will be compared between a standard (uncoated) 720nm filter and the Kolari Anti-Reflective Coating conversion. From left to right, these lenses are:- Sony FE 50mm f/1.8
- Zeiss Batis 25mm f/2
- Sigma 35mm f/1.4 Art (with MC-11 adapter)
Note: In all the below samples Kolari's coated version will be on the right.
Sony FE 50mm f/1.8
▲Uncoated Filter▲ - f/1.8 - ▲Kolari AR Coating▲
▲Uncoated Filter▲ - f/4 - ▲Kolari AR Coating▲
▲Uncoated Filter▲ - f/8- ▲Kolari AR Coating▲
▲Uncoated Filter▲ - f/22 - ▲Kolari AR Coating▲
The IR hot spot on the FE 50mm is not bad at all. It's not as clean as theSony/Zeiss 55mm f/1.8, but then not many lenses are. What little hot spot there is here on the smaller apertures is almost non-existent on Kolari's coated filter. Let's see how it does with a worse performer...
Simga 35mm f/1.4 Art
▲Uncoated Filter▲ - f/1.4 - ▲Kolari AR Coating▲
▲Uncoated Filter▲ - f/2 - ▲Kolari AR Coating▲
▲Uncoated Filter▲ - f/4 - ▲Kolari AR Coating▲
▲Uncoated Filter▲ - f/8 - ▲Kolari AR Coating▲
▲Uncoated Filter▲ - f/16 - ▲Kolari AR Coating▲
The difference here, between the standard and coated filter is much more noticeable. The difference at f/8 being the stand-out one for me. This lens really starts to get annoying at f/8 on a normal filter, whereas the coated version is considerably better.
Zeiss Batis 25mm f/2
▲Uncoated Filter▲ - f/2 - ▲Kolari AR Coating▲
▲Uncoated Filter▲ - f/4 - ▲Kolari AR Coating▲
▲Uncoated Filter▲ - f/8 - ▲Kolari AR Coating▲
▲Uncoated Filter▲ - f/22 - ▲Kolari AR Coating▲
At 720nm the Batis lens is generally acceptable at f/4, when using Kolari's coated conversion. With a standard 720nm filter the chances of getting usable results on the same lens and settings are heavily against you, producing a large amount of failures. This is where the coated option shows it's true value in my opinion. Common middle apertures see improvements that often make the difference between a good image and a bad one.